Many people believe that children should be educated by the nature while others think it wastes their time and they should only study at school. Which option do you choose?
Nowadays, education systems have sparked off a heated controversy over what kind of training program they execute. While many people defend keeping study at school only, others believe that it should stay parallel with learning in the nature. Personally, I am in favor of this combination and will support my view with examples and reasons in this essay.
First, training kids in wildlife is a way to improve their awareness of preventing the environment from damage. In fact, if children are allowed to contact with the nature, they will understand deeply about how essential flora and fauna are, as well as the role they play in preserving the ecological balance. Therefore, this assists children not only appreciate their great impact on human life but also foster their zest for guarding the environment, encouraging them to stop many harmful activities and aim to improve protect the wildlife. As a result, combining traditional education with training in the nature, schools will be able to equip students with valuable knowledge, making them responsible to the Mother nature, which may not be achieved when children study at school only.
Last but not least, running wild in the woods and fields is an ideal choice for children’s health and intelligence. According to many researches in several nations, children’s brain are more creative, fantastic and observable when they exposure to the natural space. Moreover, encouraging children to go outdoor and explore the wildlife can naturally making them burn calories as well as improve their immune system. Consequently, they are less likely to suffer from a huge number of health problems such as obesity, diabetes or several metabolism disorders.
In conclusion, the nature is appropriately important to educate children, thanks to its ability to provides ecological intelligence but also develop their health and consciousness of defending natural world from harm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-08 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The map below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The graph show the progress of milk production.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 89
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th examples and reasons in this essay. First, training kids in wildlife is a wa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed when children study at school only. Last but not least, running wild in the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
... and explore the wildlife can naturally making them burn calories as well as improve t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etes or several metabolism disorders. In conclusion, the nature is appropriate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41914191419 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88438271551 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63696369637 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5577864871 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280019615629 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883700799361 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804223947188 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151738522192 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421480259624 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.