Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed that whether money is squanderred to hold huge sport competitions, or they have positive implications on the host nation. This essay will elaborate on both side of the argument, and explain why the gains would overshadow the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the country organizing the events in many dimensions. Large sport festivals are opportunities for nations in order to promote their national images to the world. The promotion not only renders the host regconizable to the rest of the planet, but fosters their soft power, thus facilitates economic, cultural, social cooperations globally. Another advantage of holding international sporting events is the support for sports development. Companies are often keen on attatching their brands with successful athletes such as Messi, Ussan Bolt. Thus, the success of such emminent professionals would attract extra resources to spur the progress of their sport in general.
On the other hand, there are dark sides of organizing colossal sport events. The first is it would cost the host nation a predigous amount of investment. Despite the huge allocation of resources in advance, it is uncertain that the authorities are able to reap the benefit from their invesment. It is common that nations often mire down in debt after holding large sport competitions. Additionally, the avalanche of visitors to a foreign country will take a toll on the well-being of the local. Differences in religious believes, customs, and lifestyle would place the foreigners at odds with local citizens. This acts as a predecessor for unwanted conficts between the native and overseas sport enthusiasts.
In sum, even though the outcome of spending money on sport events is unclear and the events would hobble the regular routine of local people, the organizers are given great chance to introduce their nations and attain financial as well as other benefits from them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, well, in general, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31391585761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89948493936 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588996763754 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6128747533 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266842843581 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821176249956 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05868437173 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159924364323 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178804016501 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.