Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed that whether money is squanderred to hold huge sport competitions, or they have positive implications on the host nation. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument, and explain why the gains would overshadow the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the country organizing the events in many dimensions. Large sport festivals are opportunities for nations in order to promote their national images to the world. The promotion not only renders the host regconizable to the rest of the planet, but fosters their soft power, thus facilitates their economic, cultural, social cooperations globally. Another advantage of holding international sporting events is sports development. Companies often utilize the reputation of renowned athletes such as Messi, Ussan Bolt for selling their offerings, which makes them allot billion dollars to the sports and players. The appearance of such eminent professionals in those major events thus would attract extra resources to spur the progression of sports in general.
On the other hand, there are dark sides of organizing major sport events. The first issue is that the host nation has to bear prodigous expense including new constructions, and refurbishment of available facilities and infrastructures. Despite the huge allocation of resources in advance, it is uncertain that the authorities are able to reap the benefits from the bet. It is not uncommon that the colossal cost of holding such events leaves nations mired down in debt afterwards. Additionally, the influx of foreign visitors may disturb the local ambience. Differences in religious beliefs, customs, and lifestyle would place the foreigners at odds with local citizens. This acts as a predecessor for unwanted hostility between local and overseas sport enthusiasts.
In sum, the outcome of spending money on sport events is unclear and the events would hobble the regular routine of local people. However, the organizers are given great chance to introduce their nations to the world and encourage domestic sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | linhchihwg | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear energy overweigh the disadvantages Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 84
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...their offerings, which makes them allot billion dollars to the sports and players. The ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46273291925 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97404153222 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3893912317 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26033831934 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778097886476 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625140087329 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153250484032 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333947816352 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.