Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Relocating big businesses and factories to countryside away from the city is considered by many as a good idea. Some national governments have been persuaded to move their buildings to countryside. Personally, I believe that relocating companies from cities to rural area has more advantages than disadvantages.

On the one hand, it is indisputable fact that companies produce more and more rubbish, the effects which give rise to pollution in city area. As a result, the quality of air may become deteriorated. In order to construct buildings and factories, they may require unimaginable hectares, which means that deforestation may require to clean the land. Due to the loss of habitats, the diverse species of wildlife creatures may become extinct. For instance, the Coca Cola company, one of the largest one over the world, can be replaced to residential areas which can provide accomodates about hundreds of residents. Having changed the place of companies and industries from cities to rural areas, the lives of citizens in urban places would be noticeably flourished.

On the other hand, I believe that the encouragement to move factories and firms to rural areas is far more benefitial. Firstly, high skill employees and potential job seekers will spread out equally throughout a country. As one of the reason of living in congested city is for employment, the move to factories and business can be seen as a motivation to decide to reside in remote areas. Consequently, it can be a way to ease the uneven population between cities and countryside.

To recapitulate, even though it seems that the relocation of business may damage the natural environment, I still believe that relocation will be advantageous factor of making prosperous countries. The advantages of this phenomenon are outweighed by the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cleaning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: cleaning
...ch means that deforestation may require to clean the land. Due to the loss of habitats, ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, for instance, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2662116041 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13579635677 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0858883316 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14186856498 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467640894308 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397736640273 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841182617706 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00642946491067 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.