Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Keeping pets is a topic that has sparked debate among individuals, particularly when it comes to their impact on children. While some argue that having pets is beneficial for children, others express concerns about the potential dangers and negative health effects. This essay will explore both perspectives and provide an opinion on the matter.
One view is that having pets can be highly beneficial for children. Pets, such as dogs or cats, can provide companionship and emotional support, teaching children about empathy, responsibility, and unconditional love. Research has shown that children who grow up with pets tend to develop better social skills and have a higher level of self-esteem. Additionally, taking care of a pet can instill a sense of routine and discipline in children, as they learn to feed, groom, and exercise them. Pets can also serve as a source of entertainment and play, promoting physical activity and reducing stress levels.
On the other hand, some argue that keeping pets can pose dangers and unhealthy aspects for children. Allergies and asthma are common concerns, as children with pre-existing conditions may experience worsened symptoms due to pet dander or fur. Additionally, there is a risk of injury, particularly with larger or more energetic pets, which may accidentally scratch a child. Moreover, some individuals worry about the transmission of zoonotic diseases from animals to humans, although such cases are relatively rare. Lastly, the financial burden of pet ownership, including veterinary care, food, and supplies, can be a strain on families, potentially affecting the overall well-being of children
In conclusion, the debate surrounding the impact of keeping pets on children is multifaceted. While there are clear benefits, such as fostering empathy, responsibility, and social skills, concerns about allergies, injuries, disease transmission, and financial strain cannot be ignored. Ultimately the decision to have a pet should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the specific circumstances and needs of the child and family. Proper education, supervision, and responsible pet ownership can help mitigate any potential risks and ensure a positive and healthy experience for both children and their pets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57183908046 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07855464119 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.407165395 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.1875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24757318791 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885735402315 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838066743615 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167196995295 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526150333455 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.