Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the present time, mass media such as news, internet, etc not only improve our life but also raise the awareness of humans about wrong-doers. Whether these platforms should show up all information about offenders or not remains controversial. From my point of view, I totally agree that the media should not reveal crimes with too much detail. This essay will give some drawbacks of describing total materials.
First of all, excessive disclosure of criminal information affects not only the offender but also the victim. It is obvious that the internet can give rise to exaggerated speed of news spread. After pictures, data were published on social platforms, some people were notorious as a crimes. Therefore, it can be difficult for them to be reintegrated into the community, especially petty offenders who had good behaviors after reeducated may struggle to secure a job. For their victims, their privacy, daily activities are also influenced. As a case in point, a tragic story in Japan, in 2008, an 8-year-old girl was raped and beaten by a drunk 57-year-old man. This matter aroused the fury of citizens and most people knew. That girl then became the centre of journalists and until now, she and her family have had to move to other places many times.
Furthermore, the number of wrongdoers are increasing in terms of quantity, complexity and heinousness after broadcasting too much detail. This information will stimulate the curiosity of young people tending to follow and unaware of the consequences, for instance, using a knife to injure others. In addition, later offenders can know the police investigation process so they can avoid it in some different ways. This contributed to hard capture crimes of police.
To sum up, although the media is the major platform for knowing the problems happening all over the world, sometimes it can bring a few drawbacks for younger generations and cause many regretful crimes. Hence,the police should control the amount of information given to the media.
- It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 89
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et can give rise to exaggerated speed of news spread. After pictures, data were p...
^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a crime' or simply 'crimes'?
Suggestion: a crime; crimes
...latforms, some people were notorious as a crimes. Therefore, it can be difficult for the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the curiosity of young people tending to follow and unaware of the consequences, ...
^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...s and cause many regretful crimes. Hence,the police should control the amount of inf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80061126751 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647416413374 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0541300409 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134551000471 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405528167248 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493236756417 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837849515988 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436606052293 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.