Some people think that the media should not report details of crime to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In this day and age, the question of whether the media should give details of crime to the public or keep it in secret has been drawing a great deal of public attention. While many people agree that the detailed information should be given apparently to the public, I lament that it is integral to conceal the information.
It is undeniable that publishing details can bring citizens plenty of benefits. First and foremost, inhabitants’ precious lives and valuable possessions can be kept safely. It can be explained that due to the availability of information, people's awareness of their surroundings can increase, so they can protect their properties by locking their door before going out, or restrain themselves not to go out alone at night. On top of that, the crime rate seems to soak once the details of criminal acts are published overwhelmingly. If a sophisticated crime is caught by a police officer, it can pose a threat to criminals, and also decline the intention of committing.
.
Despite all aforementioned information, it is better not to show details. As soon as the offences are broadcasted, it probably makes people nervous about their surroundings. They might not think there is a criminal in their space, so the government may be complained by citizens. Many people also question the security in their space and can make a decision to move out to another safer-place. Furthermore, detailed information can inspire others offenders, deterring them from making the same mistake. For instance, if a criminal was caught by leaving their finger print at the crime scene, the would-be criminal may wear hand gloves in order not to be caught by police officers. This can create more visible burdens on the government to solve near- future crimes by the criminal’s in-depth knowledge.
In conclusion, it causes more harm than good to show detailed information of any crime to publish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-09 | akmalfikri1 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | timgu | 47 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | ieltsgetgo | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | Emma1998 | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 87
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In this day and age, the question of whether the media should give details of crime ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o decline the intention of committing. . Despite all aforementioned informati...
^^
Line 6, column 664, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hand gloves in order not to be caught by police officers. This can create more vi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08917197452 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99774669723 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.993736928 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168120770219 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595876080504 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611485591418 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124369386735 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916012695028 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.