Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disargee?
It is argued that because there are instint qualities between two genders, some certain careers are suitable for men and vice versa, some other jobs are suitable for women. Personally, I partly argee with this point of view.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that male and female have some different features. The most different quality between male and female is physical strengh. Men are considered to be stronger than women so that the number of man in jobs that require strengh is usually higher. Army, for instance is a job that has more men than women taking part in. In addition, men usually perfom better in science areas such as mathematic or physic whereas women are inclined to art areas This tendency can be saw from the childhood. For example, the grades of science subjects among schoolboys are usually higher than that of schoolgirls.
On the other hand, although there are diffences of qualities, women are able to do men's jobs and vice versa. Women nowadays can take up exercise so that they can do strengh-required jobs as well as men. For example, there are loads of women who are policemen, soldiers or instruction workers. And because many women can earn money better than men, a large number of men choose to stay at home and take care of children, which is considered women's responsibilities. There are also men who can do women's job very well and become famouse such as chiefs, models or make - up artists.
In conclusion, I believe that although having some instinct qualities, men and women should have equal opportuinities on choosing a job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | pateldhruv272 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | pateldhruv272 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | Linh Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | pd | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | pd | 61 | view |
- More and more people think there is no need for printed newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 65
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 76
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
.... For example, there are loads of women who are policemen, soldiers or instruction work...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y women can earn money better than men, a large number of men choose to stay at home and take car...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63117485408 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4842143646 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455823721392 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159277227501 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116969237823 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305956272934 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592000392199 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.