Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary world, most of the working organization environments are not based on gender. A certain set of people believes that due to specific skillsets of men and women these practices should not follow. In this essay, it will be discussed that why such thinking based scenarios are absolutely preposterous.

To embark on, from antiquity there are several examples regarding how women have proved themselves equivalent to men. For instance, Queen Victoria, Madam Curi and so on marked their presence in the fields which were under the high influence of male dominating society. Certainly, such females are still unique resemblance of women empowerment generations. However, some features like physical and psychological differences are inevitable, yet these do not forbid or deter them to show interests in any field.

On the contrary, no such skill is out there in the world which could not be mastered with patience and diligence. There are more eminent male chefs, teachers and fashion designers around the globe then women, similarly, on the other side of the spectrum, we have numbers of mathematicians, scientists and astronauts from another gender than male. Such demographics apparently depicts that ideas which advocate in favor of works should be distributed as per the sex of human seems absurd.

In conclusion, people have their opinion that jobs should be distributed according to the gender of a person, due to their specific skills based on gender. Although there are some differences in physical and psychological perspectives, however, any skill can be learned with diligence and patience. This essay discussed these points and elaborated why jobs should never be distributed on the basis of the sex of an individual.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3321299639 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95263163953 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6111477792 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180196227471 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563656433976 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045800244065 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102576513575 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487928435901 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.