some people think that mobile phones are harmful to children, while others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
According to a fair amount of people, mobile has become a great source of distraction for the young generation. On the contrary, some believe opposite to it. If asked, I would like to state my opinion that mobile phones are aidful for children for the study and knowledge purpose. I have discussed both views and my points are described in further paragraphs.
It can be seen that the new generation is being technophobic due to a great number of increases in modern technology and electric devices. The mobile phone is a handy device that children can use it for several purposes. Learning from the phone can provide both knowledge and fun to the students. For instance, a biology student can learn different types of parts by watching through cell phones more interestingly and deeply. Furthermore, children can gain knowledge from various fields at a time by just browsing on the internet. Mobile phones provide a platform to represent the art and creativity to students. Moreover, it is helpful for foreign students to contact their loved once in a few moments.
On the other hand, it comes with a large number of demerits. The overuse of a mobile phone can lead to eye damage for young people. Also, it might provide a lot of false information and distractions. By involving in the virtual world, children might become introvert and less social. Not only studies but also may impact on child's physical fitness. Furthermore, it may lead the child to lonely and lack confidence. So that, limited use of mobile phones must be for children.
To put my pen down, I would like to present that mobile phones are a blessing for this generation for empowering their knowledge but over usage of it may lead to many disadvantages and negative effects on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | jagrit sharma | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | jagrit sharma | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | jagrit sharma | 61 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- obesity is worldwide question for every country What are the solutions to stop this What are the causes of obesity 84
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology IT for example the World Wide Web and communication by email However these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive in th 76
- some people think that mobile phones are harmful to children while others disagree Discuss both the views and give your opinion 65
- Nowadays many people go shopping in their free time Shopping has replaced many other activities that people used to choose as their hobby Do you agree or disagree What are the reasons for this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. On the other hand, it comes with a large number of demerits. The overuse of a mobile phone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87043189369 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72855587503 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.385985494 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1578947368 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188620323423 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060433808657 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050697138843 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11667133603 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513128796185 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.