some people think that mobile phones are harmful to children while others disagree Discuss both the views and give your opinion

It is true that, mobile phones are being used in this contemporary era by children and also that is a waste of time. Whereas, many individuals are not agree with this statement. In my consideration, mobile phones has more harmful things rather than good.

To start with, mobile phones is used by children these days. That is why this phenomenon is becoming more common among the children, there are several reason behind this. Firstly, when children operate the phone so it is directly effect on children health or mentality.
Pain in eyes and weakness it is a worrying trend for many children. Moreover, Children play different types of mobile games everyday which are not useful for them. Secondly, most children are addict to phones because mobile phones is a handy product and anyone carry very easy in day to day life. In addition, children keep using social media apps, looking wasteful videos and so on and precious time is being wasted by children.

Looking at the other view, children can use their mobile phone for studying, or in emergency. For example, if any student sturglling in any topic and which is not possible to understand in school then they can study on that topic through mobile phones. Furthermore, children also use mobile phones for looking a way of home on google maps because this is a technology era, so all things also do digitally rather than offline.

On a concluding note, undoubtedly phones are good for students because it is a highly advanced product yet. We must understand that it is not good for children health as well as eyes

Votes
Average: 7.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ldren and also that is a waste of time. Whereas, many individuals are not agree with th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...time. Whereas, many individuals are not agree with this statement. In my consideratio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this phenomenon is becoming more common among the children, there are several re...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...en play different types of mobile games everyday which are not useful for them. Secondly...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'carries'.
Suggestion: carries
...le phones is a handy product and anyone carry very easy in day to day life. In additi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any student sturglling in any topic and which is not possible to understand in s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, for example, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85185185185 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50952643104 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559259259259 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.230106831 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209986739052 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851510167927 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559129654719 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127842019751 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374551774645 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.