Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops and on public transports. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some people suggest that a ban should be issued on the use of mobile phones in public areas such as libraries, shops and on public transports. Personally, I partly agree with the notion since phones must be prohibited in some places while being allowed in others.
On the one hand, prohibiting mobile phones is necessary in some special settings for their disturbing features. Specifically, many public locations are designed to be calm and silent in order to help people to concentrate and work or study. As phones possess the nature of being auditorily distractive, they would interfere with the tranquil atmosphere, which is against the primary requirement of places such as libraries. Consequently, it is essential to ban mobile phones in places that are highly serene.
On the other hand, people need to be permitted to use mobile phones in other places. In fact, in the era of cutting-edge technology, phone applications can be utilized to assist people in different aspects of life besides their rudimentary function to communicate. For instance, individuals can make online payments in shopping centers or purchase the ticket for the next trip on bus. Therefore, in places that do not have to retain a certain level of silence like libraries, mobile phones shuolf not be forbidden.
To conclude, although some people advocate a complete ban on mobile phones in public places, I would like to express a partial alignment. While they should be banned in places that serve the purpose of helping people to focus and maximize their productivity, people still need to have permission to use them in other places.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-02 @hoangnguyen 73 view
Essays by user @hoangnguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09398496241 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82571006036 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0566643138 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.916666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413076670899 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159497698878 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967451983622 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278605164939 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797811349893 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.