Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discuss development money should or should not be consumed in ameliorating the technology for discovering space. While spacious development can widen people's horizons and modernize our life, I personally believe that money should be spent on the other factors. This social phenomenon will be analyzed in the following essay before my rational conclusion is reached.
First and foremost, technology for spacious development cost us an arm and a leg. It is nonsense if we just only concentrate on these experiments while the poverty, starving, etc situations are not reduced. Secondly, it is hardly unaccepted that the main aim of every nation is bringing happiness to each individual life. Instead of investing a bunch of money in technology for the cosmos, we can utilize this for healthcare services, schools, etc. Developing outer space merely brings a minor meaning to the ecstasy of national residents. Thirdly, improving technology for space exploration is a tool for developed countries in order to prove their development and prosperous power. The race of investing in outer space among these nations can lead to economic hardships, wars, etc.
To be more precise, splashing money on universal technology can bring a detrimental influence on society. For instance, taxes in every country may increase dramatically to serve this development. This can create an economic burden for the resident and the government which can lead to a nation's deflation. However, it is evident that spacious technology partly contributes to stupendous achievements in our modern life. We can explore a range of novel things which is the base for us the seek for the new era - the technology-driven age. Consequently, splashing the money for these explorations can force us to accelerate the development process by modernizing and upgrading the standard of living.
In conclusion, investing money in space exploration does not always mean useless. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly give a green light for using the money for other developing elements because there still exist many underprivileged cases which are alarming to mitigate as soon as possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40469208211 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1363694037 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5919480248 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.388888889 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286582463583 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950275497179 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607369818809 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185501024009 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0037597184536 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.