Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some critics argue that spending money on discovering the space is not justified and this money should be spent for more sufficient purposes. Personally, I totally agree with this argument since there are more severe problems on the earth that governments and society should tackle than in the space.
To begin with, spending money on exploring the space could not only waste money but also harm the environment. Those exploration journeys usually cost government bodies billion of dollars, which could be utilized to support the underprivileged for years. Furthermore, each launch of spaceships could devastate the surrounding areas, destroying green forests and contaminating rivers, which kills the animals that live in those areas.
Those money should be spent on developing public amenities and education. In terms of public services, local and national authorities could provide more public transport, construct more open areas, and offer cost-free health services. Free health services, for instance, would save many underprivileged people from illnesses, which then create a healthier society. If more public transportation is offered to the citizens, they would have motivation to use fewer private vehicles. This would then reduce the amount of released carbon emissions, which mitigate global warming. Additionally, money should be spent on upgrading facilities at public schools. This would provide incentives for children to attend classes and absorb knowledge. A more qualified generation as a result would create a good-quality workforce, which then foster the economic growth.
In conclusion, I believe that government bodies should spend money on public services and education rather than space exploration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these view and give 78
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...journeys usually cost government bodies billion of dollars, which could be utilized to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'Those moneys', 'Those monies'?
Suggestion: This money; Those moneys; Those monies
... the animals that live in those areas. Those money should be spent on developing public am...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68965517241 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88519230552 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2664291328 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271411001478 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993469766203 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095217512526 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176539787055 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838646289924 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...journeys usually cost government bodies billion of dollars, which could be utilized to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'Those moneys', 'Those monies'?
Suggestion: This money; Those moneys; Those monies
... the animals that live in those areas. Those money should be spent on developing public am...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68965517241 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88519230552 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2664291328 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271411001478 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993469766203 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095217512526 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176539787055 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838646289924 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.