Some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government. However, others argue that they should be funded by non-government sources Give your opinion
In today's world, sport games have gained great attention from the public and one of the most curious is the financial aid sources of national teams. While some people believe the government should be in charge, others contend that the power can be conceded to private businesses. From my point of view, I am of the opinion that both the national budget and entrepreneurs’ investment should support the sport teams.
On the one hand, it is obvious that corporations can contribute greatly to the success of team sports. The first thing is that they can have expansive resources and expertises in a myriad of fields including nutritions, practicing schedules and the like. If they sponsor the athletes, those players can inherit better equipment and training, which is a precursor for their future victory. Another thing is that the patrons can underpin the governments’ financial pressure as well as take returns themselves. For example, if a private company holds a national competition, it can share the funding with the state's budget and take advantage of this event as a type of advertising. As a result, the company does not only popularize itself but also gains reputations.
On the other, although the role of private investment is crucial, the governments' power is still a part and parcel. It is undoubted that no matter how much money are the national teams sponsored, it is all profit -oriented. If the state just turns over the rights and power to companies, the teams will soon be turned into marketing subjects. That will pose great damages to the image of the country for which the teams represent . Thus, when the governments put great emphasis on their main role in training and supporting the athletes, they can balance between monetary benefits and the dignity and solidarity of the teams.
In conclusion, I am convinced that harmonizing the role of governments and entrepreneurs can benefit the national teams the most as it assures financial aid, together with the spirit of the sports.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he country for which the teams represent . Thus, when the governments put great em...
^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...together with the spirit of the sports. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, thus, well, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05688622754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80669595124 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547904191617 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0780894249 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271417980443 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809095938226 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641662219003 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162356678476 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831461584036 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.