The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

The chart illustrates the frequency of Americans who consumed fast food in restaurants over the course of 10 years starting in 2003.

As can be seen from the chart, there were periods of fluctuation in the years surveyed in all categories of frequency. Moreover, it was recorded that people in America were most likely to eat in fast food restaurants once a week while the figures for eating everyday or never were the lowest.

In particular, there was under 5% of people who consumed fast food everyday in 2003 and the figures for 2006 and 2013 were even lower, at 3%. The similar pattern happened with the "never" sector, with higher percentages of 5% and 4% respectively. Furthermore, the figures for Americans eating in fast food restaurants many times per week, once a week or just a few times a week all witnessed a slight rise of approximately 2% between 2003 and 2006. Meanwhile the percentages for people consuming frequently and one time a week fell in the next 7 years, from 20% to above 15% for the former and from 33% to 28% for the latter, the number of people eating occasionally, just a few times per year kept stable. By contrast, it was the “ once or twice a month" category that registered fluctuation over the period, with a 5% decrease before significantly increasing to 33% in 2013.

Interestingly, while this sector saw marked rise, the figures for people consuming fast food every week were still the highest.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nce a week while the figures for eating everyday or never were the lowest. In partic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...approximately 2% between 2003 and 2006. Meanwhile the percentages for people consuming fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ar kept stable. By contrast, it was the “ once or twice a month' category th...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, still, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.848 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89495008593 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2579420229 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218064309677 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992103856685 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676364964066 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149060476174 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414948948683 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.