Modern applied science have been infiltrated in every sphere of life. Number of individuals perceive that utilization of latest technology enhances employees’ lives in many ways; however, others put forward some demerits for them. Prior to my stance, this essay will scrutinize both aspects of the argument.
Discussing the former view, an increased use of newer technology in work area causes many positive impacts in lives of employees. The most noticeable one is task easiness offered by incorporation of up to date technologies. Better instruments and artificial intelligent have simplified almost every complex task to be performed. As a results, less efforts needed from workers. Moreover, with hyphenated-technology lesser time require for manufacturing goods, which leads to better productivity and output. Ultimately, worker can receive higher increments and incentives. Lastly, upgraded tech demands certain operational skills. Hence, working individuals would have an opportunity to explore their skills in fresh horizons.
Conversely, there are many people who believe usage of forefront technology has negative consequences in jobholder’s lives. They argues that as a repercussion of over utilization of this modern applications, job redundancy can be observed. Latest automated machinery can be handled by one person instead of dozen worker which has created unemployment. Despite this, certain personal skills may disappears in long run. For instance, art and craft work gasps for survival due to its replacement by 3-D printing devices. Furthermore, a few have become lethargic in work. Because, their role is limited only as observatory person in front of machine empowered by innovative technology.
In conclusion, although a faction tend to believe that cutting-edge technology has posed some disadvantages, I believe that appropriate applications of this modernization can improve lives of employees in multiple ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...f individuals perceive that utilization of latest technology enhances employees' liv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
... every complex task to be performed. As a results, less efforts needed from workers. More...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lex task to be performed. As a results, less efforts needed from workers. Moreover, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'argue'
Suggestion: argue
...quences in jobholder's lives. They argues that as a repercussion of over utiliza...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. They argues that as a repercussion of over utilization of this modern applicat...
^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e, a few have become lethargic in work. Because, their role is limited only as observat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d only as observatory person in front of machine empowered by innovative technolo...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...innovative technology. In conclusion, although a faction tend to believe that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87368421053 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34833190739 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694736842105 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6569554703 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1052631579 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136748794063 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308440694064 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479850963892 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087442083941 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414906752305 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.17 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.