Nowadays Childers are taking part in various kind of activities which include group as well as individual activities. Taking part in arranged group activities are inspire by a group of guardians. At the same time some guardian claim that it is crucial for children to study how to do things are their own. There are Split view regarding the debatable argument. Prior to my inclination by the view are discussed further.
Discussing the first view point, the most relevant argument that supporter put forward is that children will learn how to lead a group and also how to build bonding with other. This is because, participating in activity where more than two children are doing the same task will improve their bonding, co-operation and also make them good leader for future. Apart from this, it make children aware about the society. This convey that, during this task they get in touch with different part out society which define the various task execute by different community. To cap it all, participating with various kind of person they also start respecting culture of other people.
However, the latter view has its own arguments. The strongest protest is children will find their own interest. By this, I mean as they are doing all their work at own they will find their passion in which they really want to do something great. Besides this, children can concentrate on single task and achieve desire outcome. For example, children is just doing one thing like painting than he can learn how to do painting by own doing research over internet and get good result. To sum up, children become independent while executing any task as they are collection data at their own.
In conclusion, despite people having bifurcated views, I would clearly support the former view. As in is essential for then to interact with other during their whole life and they respect each other and their culture as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inspired'.
Suggestion: inspired
...g part in arranged group activities are inspire by a group of guardians. At the same ti...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... leader for future. Apart from this, it make children aware about the society. This ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, really, regarding, so, then, well, while, apart from, for example, i mean, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45046179188 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5776195689 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337769006264 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109611217389 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695744149924 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216699280612 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607710691838 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.