Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people’s lives in negative ways. Others disagree and say that they have been more positive. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
For many people, news is an inseparable part of their lives. An issue in dispute is whether the impacts of news media on humans’ lives denote a negative development. Although some people may confess its beneficial effects, others do not take the same position. Both sides will be elaborated in this essay.
The spread of the news from various media including radio, television, and the Internet has had potential advantages on people as well as the societies. Needless to say that collecting information from the news definitely promotes the people’s awareness. Political and economic programs broadcasted from the mass media make people able to understand what is going on around the world. For people holding authorities, accessing to the internet-based media opens up an opportunity to study the opinions of people who regularly leave their viewpoints on public forums. An in-depth evaluation of the comments enhances the officials’ decision-making ability on the issues that may occur in their territories too. Furthermore, for business people, tracing current status of the global market helps them have a realistic prospect towards impending changes, leading them to prevent any costly loss of their companies.
Turning to the other side of the argument, propagation of the news can influence people’s lives in a negative way. Some media may exaggerate the magnitude of the real threats in the world, like terrorists’ attacks or prevalence of some dangerous diseases, intentionally to just gain higher audience ratings. Others may spread fake news to disturb peoples’ minds and mislead them. Moreover, some news channels may try to inculcate their own point of views to the peoples’ mind, encouraging them to think in a way in favor of their policy.
Weighing all the aforementioned arguments, I can conclude that having access to the news from various media is more beneficial for both people and the societies. To overcome the harmful sides, the authorities can have a close surveillance, controlling the spread of the disturbing information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | sandip24 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | bali | 92 | view |
| 2020-12-25 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | alireza-kia | 84 | view |
- It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 84
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend? 89
- In the world of internet, people write on internet about a product’s reviews and opinions about a service.Is it a good thing or bad thing? 78
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? 76
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online Is this a positive or a negative development Provide relevant examples from you own experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...f the news can influence people’s lives in a negative way. Some media may exaggerate the magnitud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36307692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02166692505 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593846153846 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9748193437 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33217915603 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105471569773 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695087614107 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196874679013 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403251509751 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.