Some people think that old houses should be knocked down to build new houses or apartment blocks. Others think that old houses should be protected because they are part of a nation’s history. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions differ on whether old houses should be diminished to build new constructions or protected because they are belong to nation’s history. Personally, I am in agreement with the latter view, even though the other one also shows some positive aspects.
The option to destroy the old houses to build the new ones is attractive for some reasons. One benefit is that this can bring us better living environment. To put it clearly, some old houses are unhealthy and unpleasant to live. Almost old apartment blocks are small, not enough space for kitchen and living rooms. Therefore, people should move to new convenient flats which have more space for family activities. Besides, old house often downgrades after a long time, it is certainly not suitable place for children and elderly to live.
However, I believe it is more beneficial to protect old houses because of their important role in history. In other words,most old buildings were attached to history events or the way our ancestors used to live. By teaching about these buildings, teachers can motivate the patriotism and the pride of the students. Another advantage is that old constructions can be used for attracting foreigners around the world. For example, Hoi An ancient town, one of the most hottest spots in Vietnam, which has many antique architectures. Travellers seem keen on the beauty of old constructions, so most local people here earn living depend on tourist activities.
For the reasons mentioned above, while old houses should be destroyed to build new houses shows undeniable positive aspects, it seems to me that we should keep protecting these old architectures because of their vital role in history and tourism.
- Some people say it is the best for children to start learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Other people say it is better to start later. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- The graph below shows the numbers of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 73
- Some people think that old houses should be knocked down to build new houses or apartment blocks. Others think that old houses should be protected because they are part of a nation’s history. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people are not sure if exams are really the best way to test a student’s abilities. Other people think that there are too many exams and this is stressful for many students. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...tructions or protected because they are belong to nation's history. Personally, I...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , most
...mportant role in history. In other words,most old buildings were attached to history ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'hottest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: hottest
...xample, Hoi An ancient town, one of the most hottest spots in Vietnam, which has many antiqu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the hottest'.
Suggestion: most the hottest
...xample, Hoi An ancient town, one of the most hottest spots in Vietnam, which has many antiqu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14388489209 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7798844153 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9872608935 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381618697804 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129686563627 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124439435356 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267347835584 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823252806206 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.