Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about environmental problems. Controversy exists as to whether lifting the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is the best way to deal with the problems related to the environment. From my point of view, I strongly suspect that this is not the most qualified method which can be used to improve the environment.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that increasing the fuel price can reduce the amount of exhaust fume. One example to support this point is that according to the statistics published recently on CJES, in Iran average 1% higher actual price of fuel will reduce carbon emission by 0.14%. This figure is estimated to continue going down in the next year. Therefore, the benefit of this method is undisputed.
On the other hand, one compelling argumentative against this opinion is that raising the price of fuel raises many objections of citizens. This is shown by the following example. In 2019, after the current president Emmanuel Macron, together with his government, introduced a series of taxes which hit petrol with a stark price increase, Paris was engulfed by the initial outcry of dismay with public area being set alight by demonstrators. That leads to the blockades, violence and even fatalities which made the French government eventually had to revoke their policy and made the old fuel price come back. As a result, it is obvious that the escalation of fuel cost has sparked many protests of the general public.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that to some extent, increasing fuel price has good solutions for the problems regarding to environment, especially exhaust fume emission. However, it also brings some negative impact to the public. To the best of my knowledge, I wholly disagree with this measure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | jennyntea | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | jennyntea | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | amelianguyen | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Nowadays many people work from home Some think it is beneficial others think it may distract the family routine What is my opinion 67
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped Instead they should spend the money on housing and road development To what extent do you agree 84
- Nowadays media should include more good news in their publications Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Nowadays we can see definite sign of surplus production in almost every industry sector and thus is leading to environmental damage What are the some possible solution to this situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ironmental problems. Controversy exists as to whether lifting the cost of fuel for cars and o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...l cost has sparked many protests of the general public. Given the aforementioned points, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01973684211 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71689816976 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4856640499 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.733333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226684655058 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711559641385 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09065461575 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14438239812 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744323181603 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.