Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, environmental degradation has become increasingly alarming across the globe. Whether the cost of fuel for transportation should be raised to tackle this issue is a debatable topic. For me, I believe there are several plausible alternatives.
It is obvious that increasing the fuel price could be of some help to the environment, but it also triggers several adverse impacts on society. Though the necessity of travelling is hardly arguable among citizens, it is likely that only wealthy people may afford the accelerating cost. This puts financial pressure on others with low income, as a result, the gap between the rich and the poor is prone to be loosened. Not to mention, the inflation, caused by higher price of products and services as the cost of transportation keeps going up, is predictable. In the first quarter of 2019, Vietnam witnessed the increase of 2% in the CPI index, which was attributed to the rise of 1% in the price of gas and petrol previously.
Environment-related problems could be tackled by other methods of greater effectiveness. First, there should be an international collaboration on the commitment to curb the proportion of exhaust fume released each year. This is because it is considered as the main culprit of Greenhouse Effect, the primary cause of Global warming which is threatening the habitat of many endangered species. Another crucial measure worth mentioning is to raise the public awareness as each individual could put effort to alleviate environmental deterioration. To illustrate, the Earth hour has achieved huge success all over the world, which attracted millions of young people together protecting the green of the Earth, simply by switching off all electricity devices for one hour.
In conclusion, it is my belief that dealing with environmental degradation consists of both governmental and individual efforts rather than heightening the price of fuel
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opini 84
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 78
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 84
- In many societies there is less social contact between the elderly and the young What are the reasons and what measures can be taken 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28758169935 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17829905146 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1885860535 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190428702129 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057722708396 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350462830562 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111252738803 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325085424154 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.