Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion?

This is believed by some people that only the employees who have invested their years working in an organization should be raised in rank. I; however, do not agree with this notion as the young workers are more skilled and seeing scarce chances of flourishing would highly discourage them to work for such a company.

To begin with, the young employees wo have recently completed their education and training are adroit than the senior staff members who do not make additional effort to learn innovative and modern skills. Unlike them, adult workers are keen on learning recent advancements since the job market has become increasingly competitive lately. Because they have mastered hard and soft skills, they can prove to be absolutely productive for the company. Moreover, young workers are comparatively more energetic therefore, they can work extra for the prosperity of their company. A study conducted in Florida in 2018 showed that employers who preferred young employees had high success rate.

In addition to this, young staff members when would sense limited chances of prosepering, would definitely hesitate to go an extra mile in work for the company. Because such academically exceptional and talented workers would not be allowed to have executive positions, they would not work much diligently and sincerely. As they have worked hard to attain these higher degrees, seeing their hard work not getting paid off would discouarge them. Consequently, the company would not flourish. An article published in a newspaper, The Times, showed how young scientists discovered a technique to measure blood glucose level without pricking a person. Hence, its obvious how the young talent is useful.

To conclude, though the senior employees are more experienced, the chances of prosperity should be equal to attract young adroit and highly qualified workers to flourish.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34006734007 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70074809834 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2824727688 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155384497218 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573861233087 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540103573621 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103493438192 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479775665954 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.