Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an ongoing on whether governments should pay more attention to reducing environmental pollution and housing conditions to prevent illness and disease. I strongly agree with the notion that governments should take more action to address these issues.
Firstly, environmental pollution has a direct impact on human health. This could be explained by looking at factories and vehicles, which release toxic pollutants into the air, potentially causing respiratory diseases and other serious health conditions. As such, the government has a crucial role in regulating factories and enforcing environmental policies. For example, they should publish new rules to require factories to install proper emission control systems and also invest in renewable energy. This could minimize pollution.
secondly, poor housing also contributes to the spread of diseases. Lacking clean water and overcrowding lead to the outbreak of infectious diseases, particularly in low-income communities. Therefore, the government also allocates funds to ensure that citizens access essential public services such as healthcare, and safe and affordable housing, which enables citizens to prevent illness and disease effectively.
In addition, it is the government’s responsibility to make education a top priority. allowing them to recognize the importance of disease prevention. School curriculums and community programs are all effective tools to promote healthy living and disease prevention. For example, schools would provide nutrition education and offer opportunities for physical activity, which allows citizens to inform about healthy lifestyles, while community programs enable them to access free health screenings and education resources. All of which could encourage healthy habits and contribute to the overall well-being of the citizens.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that the reduction of environmental pollution and the resolution of housing issues should be solved by governments, prioritizing public health education, and providing vital public services as well as deterring factories by stricter policies. Contributing to disease prevention and the well-being of the citizens.
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ergy. This could minimize pollution. secondly, poor housing also contributes to the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Allowing
...ility to make education a top priority. allowing them to recognize the importance of dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0641025641 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13785161452 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2447142375 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.294117647 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20617466326 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654094693875 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641324555689 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119975073772 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725483831156 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.