Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Ethical behaviour is considered to be crucial for societies improvement that is why children need to learn it as soon as possible. To a certain extent, I agree that parents have a role in teaching their children how to be positive members of the community. However, I believe that schools impact on children is greater than of parents.
On one hand, parents effect on children cannot be denied, that is why they should teach their children about being good in the community the soonest possible. Children tend listen to their parents more than anyone else because they consider them as role models. So for example, if parents told their children to always show up on time, tell the truth, and treat other people with respect regardless of their gender, religion, and beliefs; children will unconsciously follow these good behaviours in their life.
On the other hand, schools have a much greater impact on children for the following reasons. First, schools follow a well designed educational programme set by the ministry of education. This means that teachers will be trained to teach ethical behaviour and follow a guideline that is written by professionals in the field. Secondly, schools can encourage children to be good citizens by involving them in community services and encouraging them to volunteer and help in organizing some school’s activities and events. This will enable the children to practically imply what they had learned in school or from their parents. Last but not least, children interaction with other kids will make their learning process quicker. It is proven in many researches that learning anything new with different people will accelerate the learning process for all.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments for both viewpoints, but I believe that the school role in teaching children ethical and good behaviour is more impactful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Julian Eta | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | koreets01 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Cho Oo | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults 84
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for theirachievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22772277228 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72442594047 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3906512896 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35203019494 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126842806622 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605904164777 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224777403272 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500732868779 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.