Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Other, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views in which methods should help children to become a good social member, are they taught by the parents or learned at school?
Based on my knowledge, parents are the first teacher to their children. In childhood, children have many time and stay with their parents so that children can learn everywhere and everytime from their parents. In addition, parents have more experience in social relationship which they will express from their body language that children can easier to learn that.
Besides that, some people agree that school is a good place to learn to be a qualified member of society. I believe that the point also important to children. There are many different roles in school, such as students, teachers, classmates and so on. Children can learn not only from teacher, but also they can learn from the peer. Children learn from their parents and apply in school or may be correct from school. Moreover, school also is a nature place for children to exercise how to be a good member because they will get in touch with others that they can learn it more.
In my honest opinion, I strongly suggest that both two views are important for children to become a good social member. When children at home where they learn from parents and when they at school learn from other people. However, if their parents are not a good member of society which means that school is the better place for them to learn.
In conclusion, learning from parents or school are both important for children, just walk along both lines will bring the better effect.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowldege or experience 89
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...r children. In childhood, children have many time and stay with their parents so that chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t also important to children. There are many different roles in school, such as students, teac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82051282051 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28189546678 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1572190137 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338729632527 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146262228043 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737045366244 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217502525087 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073633621288 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.