Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more
likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often said that individuals settling down with a permanent career soon seem to
experience further satisfaction in their work than social members regularly altering
their employment. However, from my standpoint, both these options could bestow
comparable feelings of fulfillment.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that numerous people who can opt for a job early
and maintain it may reap pleasure in their work. When realizing the job they have
a craving for earlier in their life and might land this kind of job, individuals are likely
to grasp privileges to expose the majority of their aptitudes, skills and their expertise
on their work. As a result, it is easy for them to achieve progress in their career and
receive a high salary which may satisfy their requirements for entertainment or
education. It is unquestionable that these appear to help create satisfactory with their
job.
Notwithstanding, it is my conviction that individuals, who frequently hopping their
position, can be likewise content with their employment. The first explanation is that
when regularly changing their jobs, they may have multiple opportunities to
accumulate diverse majors, skills and knowledge. Thus, they may step out of their
comfort zones in order to experience feelings of satisfaction. Another cause could
be that by virtue of regularly shifting their employment, social workers are likely to
find the most appropriate position with their personal competences and aspiration.
Hence, it would seem that job hoppers can also achieve exaltation in working.
Overall, it is sensible to conclude that not only people making an early choice of work
and pursue it for their whole life but also individuals often changing their position can
equally get satisfactory in their career.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems. 73
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals? 56
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their requirements for entertainment or education. It is unquestionable that the...
^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndividuals, who frequently hopping their position, can be likewise content with t...
^^^
Line 16, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wledge. Thus, they may step out of their comfort zones in order to experience fee...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42402826855 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96837875942 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8747781868 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.916666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204407805351 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792403785441 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542273377371 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062138010332 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468581161481 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.