Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although, it is thought by few individuals that due to the availability of various technology, discrimination between rich and impoverished people is increasing day by day, while others are of the opinion that, completely opposite is happening because of it. In my opinion, I agree with the former view that technology widens the gap because of affordability and lack of knowledge.
On the one hand, Some people think that and I agree with them that that gap between rich and poor is increasing. Firstly, it is tough for poor people to afford Various gadgets. The minimum wage for destitute people in Comparision with rich people is very low. So, majority of their income spend on a basic needs such as food and cloths. Thus, they hardly have any money left to buy any gadgets. Secondly, another reason is that, scarcity of knowledge about newly invented technology. People of upper class have all the resources and facilities available which make them aware about latest technology, whereas Poor People are deprived of all that. As a result there is a vast difference in Knowledge of both types of people.
On the other hand, other people believe that technology is decreasing the gap. The first and foremost reason is, certain inventions and discoveries are accessible to all due to their availability at cheaper rates. Many banks now Provide monetery help to the poor people to buy certain gadgets through estimated monthly installment. Hence, anyone can pay their owed money on a monthly basis. For example, mobile phones are ubiquitous to both rich and poor People because of easy accessibility and Financial help from banks.
In conclusion, though a few people believe that cheaper rates of devices and financial aid From banks can decrease the gap between wealthy and Poor People, I feel that minimum wage and lack of knowledge preventing poor People to access new technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-16 | princeeeee | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | long1964 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Elaineletere | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | trungpham96 | 64 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of affordability and lack of knowledge. On the one hand, Some people think that ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for destitute people in Comparision with rich people is very low. So, majority of...
^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
...ilities available which make them aware about latest technology, whereas Poor People are dep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 649, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s Poor People are deprived of all that. As a result there is a vast difference in ...
^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k of knowledge preventing poor People to access new technology.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05431309904 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73700310329 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1071310036 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391378476389 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1188432345 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998216145199 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22975923665 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381213145734 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.