Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the technology-driven world, while some people opine that vivid images on television and video games are beneficial for children, others still advocate the conventional reading. This essay agree that reading books is superior to gluing eyes to the small screens in terms of concentration level and the function of brain.
It is inevitable that the ability to focus of children is maintained and enhanced thanks to reading books. In other words, young people need to stay concentrated in order to follow the flow of content and absorb an overall insight in the field they are reading. However, according to some recent research, colorful images and violent scene performed on digital devices distract adolescents from their work or study, posing a threat to the development of children. Moreover, through the process of reading, intense attention is advantageous for people to revise knowledge and give careful thoughts to the ideas in the book, which generally creates some soft skills such as critical thinking.
It is undeniable that reading could assure the effectiveness and efficiency of the brain’s work.
To specify, provided they are written with care and passion, the books give young generation not only the imagination, but also the inspiration for purposeful life conveyed by emotional words. Some scientists have stated that more cells, which help the brain and body function properly, are required when reading than watching television or surfing the Internet. Thus, reading helps delaying cognitive decline when getting old, a common health problem these days due to access to modern gadgets.
In short, I firmly believe that reading possesses a number or merits for the development of children as mentioned above. Therefore, young people should be encouraged to engross themselves in paper reading by adults, especially in the period of technology domination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- some countries there is is insufficient recycling of waste materials (eg paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions? 73
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Art classes like painting and drawing are important for children’s development and should be made compulsory in high school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...te the conventional reading. This essay agree that reading books is superior to gluin...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 384, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to delay' or 'delay'.
Suggestion: to delay; delay
...rfing the Internet. Thus, reading helps delaying cognitive decline when getting old, a c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in short, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42711864407 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82421913663 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647457627119 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2856838776 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224158042548 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731814491213 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349912027106 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112121409069 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440575322357 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.