Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion?
Sentiments diverge on whether the school should categorize students based on similar abilities instead of respective skills. Although this stance can be justified to some extent, I am at loggerheads owing to certain rational reasons.
Admittedly, distributing the students whose talents are the same in one class has its teaching advantages. It is perceptible that there is no academic gap between these school-goers whose abilities are equal, so this category can create a balanced studying atmosphere. For instance, the government in Vietnam has founded a variety of gifted schools, as a result, the number of well-educated learners in classes has surged dramatically. Furthermore, students with uniform capacity can push each other to study. The reason is all members have to study in earnest in order not to be left behind or achieve better learning outcomes.
Conversely, I ascertain that mixed-ability grouping provides multiple benefits, especially in interpersonal communications. First, with a wide range of skills, students in one class can easily discuss a lesson with each other from separated perspectives, so that their knowledge can be concreted. Therefore, the lesson can be clarified comprehensively so as to assist learners in memorizing. Further and even more importantly, in the symbiotic studying environment, batches are flexible in teamwork, they will utilize their source of knowledge to boost working productivity. There was a survey conducted in Vietnam about the winning rate in competitions between the mixed-ability schools and one-skill schools. Surprisingly, the result signified the overwhelming triumph of school which possessed pupils with a variety of abilities to its opponent.
By way of conclusion, each type of academic organizing approaches has its own advantages; however, categorizing pupils with different skills in a school is more rational.
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its knowledge and cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 56
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 89
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 80
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one class', 'a class', or simply 'class'?
Suggestion: one class; a class; class
...ith a wide range of skills, students in one class can easily discuss a lesson with each o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...lesson can be clarified comprehensively so as to assist learners in memorizing. Further ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67491166078 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27754087998 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6921576599 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213768540052 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674760970443 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430315330087 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124933138958 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229542811753 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.