Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
It is true by some people that academic abilities are an element that helps schools choose students, while some suppose that the placement of students of varying aptitudes is better. From my perspective, I strongly support the first idea because it can bring benefit to both teachers and students.
On the one hand, mixed-ability classes bring many benefits to students’ development. Firstly, when students with different abilities are educated together, they would have able to learn from each other, including soft skills and new knowledge. Students who are well-versed in a particular skill can share important techniques and experience in how to master that skill with classmates who may be weaker. Another benefit of a mixed classroom lies in the cooperation between students using their diversity of strengths. Thus, they may grow up to become more well-rounded individuals.
On the other hand, I believe that there are more advantages when intelligent students are separated from weaker students. From a teacher’s perspective, they can easily plan more suitable lessons to work at the right speed for them. It not only helps students to study effectively but it also makes teaching easier for teachers. From a student’s viewpoint, they also have an opportunity to study with classmates at the same level so it is easy for the pupils to discuss the lesson and enhance their learning process. For example, almost public schools in Viet Nam categorize students based on their academic performance, students with a high academic ability can be provided with more advanced materials to progress faster.
In conclusion, it is better to group students at the same levels because it brings benefits for both students and teachers, while in mixed classes, pupils can be more rounded but it will be hard for a teacher to prepare lessons.
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 82
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 73
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 67
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit to both teachers and students. On the one hand, mixed-ability classes b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...soft skills and new knowledge. Students who are well-versed in a particular skill can s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... become more well-rounded individuals. On the other hand, I believe that there ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advanced materials to progress faster. In conclusion, it is better to gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82213537453 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3775829548 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269946444761 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100278154845 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796845141348 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172382012436 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432427951926 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.