Some people think schools should group pupils according to their academic ability, but others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The matter of categorizing students based on their abilities is a controversial issue. Both side of this debate have compelling reasons, which I will discuss. However, I believe that children should study together regardless of their intellectual abilities.
Some people claim that streaming, which means grouping students based on their abilities, is more beneficial. Firstly, they argue that this categorization allows teaching each group of students more appropriate subjects and leads to a more specialized syllabus according to student's needs. For instance, pupils with a better mathematical talent may benefit from learning more complex equations, whereas weaker students may get perplexed by these. Secondly, instructors can regulate the pace of teaching based on students' group, thus providing a better learning experience for learners. Finally, streaming enhances the spirit of competition in children and can help them progress in their future occupations.
On the other hand, I think that learning together regardless of abilities is a better alternative. The primary concern is that the rationale for grouping children may be flawed and biased. For example, it has been shown that tests that estimate the IQ of children lack accuracy and reliability. Additionally, separating students may damage their self-esteem, especially for those pupils who have been assigned to a weaker or less intelligent group. Last but not least, grouping children in this hierarchical manner may foster bullying in them by considering some pupils as superior to others.
In conclusion, in my opinion, despite the advantages that streaming may have, teaching children without grouping them offers more positive effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...group, thus providing a better learning experience for learners. Finally, streaming enhanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71484375 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99529405886 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60546875 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.786045739 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210137165316 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745486759914 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497810702313 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12434604029 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592238479795 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.