In most nations, parents are frequently concerned about how their children will be educated after they reach the eligible age for schooling, in order to maximize their children's academic ability. Therefore, there are some argumentive ideas that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that mixed-ability grouping will be better for students. As far as I am concerned, I believe that despite the traditional studying system having shortcomings in the design of curriculum, is still a more reasonable education approach.
Opponents against the student’s mixed-ability grouping often argue that if students are categorized based on their academic performance. It not only takes individual differences into thorough consideration but also exerts each one’s maximum potential. Everyone is not the same in terms of his or her learning preferences, personality and interests so that when students are selected into grouping students of similar academic achievement help the teacher tailor the reasonable syllabus to enhance their learning process and boost the pace of advancement. Moreover, this education system will minimize the negative psychological impact on interior students who perform worse in exams if they study with students at a higher level of ability.
On the other hand, people who believed that it is better to have students with different abilities study together argue that the benefits of the mixed-ability classes will help balance learning outcomes. Because the superior pupils could serve as a desirable role model for the rest of the class to be driving force to stimulate others to endeavor in studying. Besides that, This education system will be diverse class lead to students having a dynamic learning environment from this they can exert opinions with different overviews.
In conclusion, although each opinion will have each advantage, I think that students have different abilities studying together bring a lot of benefits more than the rest of the opinion while the modern education system claiming the dynamic studying environment
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6199376947 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89611409126 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1696296133 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412546030862 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157873522744 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122872982842 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251732807718 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175591129081 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.