People have different views about whether they should have different capacity support each other. While those who support teaching pupils to have abilities together, I personally think that the school having different abilities in an environment is clearly more beneficial.
On the one hand, there are several good reasons why people tend to think that teaching student according to their academic ability. Obviously, intelligent students are separated from weaker students, the teacher can easily control and plan appropriately for both types of students. For instance, teachers can assign advanced materials and exercises to good students so that they can maximize their learning, while for weaker students, they will give basic homework to help students understand and gradually become progressive. Moreover, separating the two types of students would help the bad students not have low self-esteem because they do not have to study with the good students and this would not put pressure on the other students.
Turning to the other side of the argument, I am more convinced that mixed-ability classes are more advantageous. First of all, mixing students together could help balance learning. Indeed, good students can help tutors with poorer students, and it's possible that a friend's instruction will be easier to understand than a teacher's. In addition, in such classes, children with extraordinary abilities study together and in turn they can learn from one another. Let's look at an example, a student, who is good at academic study, but weak at dancing or painting subject, she can learn how to dance or paint from her peers. Therefore, mixed-ability classes bring many opportunities for two types of students.
Taking everything into consideration, despite others' belief that separate-ability classes would bring the most effective to students, I stand by the view that mixed-ability classes would help students have exposure to a variety of aspects.
- The table chart show the population of New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 67
- The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages
- The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The table below shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friends'' or 'friend's'?
Suggestion: friends'; friend's
...oorer students, and its possible that a friends instruction will be easier to understan...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...ction will be easier to understand than a teachers. In addition, in such classes, children...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...n turn they can learn from one another. Lets look at an example, a student, who is g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43606557377 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88359863558 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7596007663 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334736457178 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123219126049 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617737653514 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207255600264 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511567951821 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.