It is common in today's society that the majority of museums and historical locations are visited by tourists while low attendance of local people at these attractions. This is caused by various factors. However, these problems could be tackled by several possible solutions.
To begin with, there are two main reasons behind this trend. The main cause of residents seems to be familiar with their traditional customs, resulting in them visiting such places which would waste time and money. Another contributing factor of
litter local people museums and historical is the design of these locations almost remain architectural throughout decades, which reduces the quality of visuals. On the contrary, tourist always attracts to explore and travel to these places since they think museums and historical sites are amazing and pick tourists' curiosity and tempt them to drop by at least once in their life.
Several solutions could be applied to solve people's local limited visits. One Possible solution is that the authorities and managers of tourists attraction should organizations games with rewards and prizes entertain residents. Moreover, the government should reduce price ticket for people local to create chance for them. Another feasible measure is that improve facilities these places tp make them more attractive.
In conclusion, this problem can be explained by various factors. However, a wide range of measures can suggested to control it.
- The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 72
- many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists rather than local people why is this what can be done to encourage local people to visit museums and historical sites 56
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some People think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd money. Another contributing factor of litter local people museums and historic...
^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...easure is that improve facilities these places tp make them more attractive. In conc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, at least, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45132743363 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64148544867 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632743362832 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.8024709855 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7692307692 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322636341644 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961015237125 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782307330699 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159311836267 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718603154743 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.