Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Schools nowadays face the dilemma of whether the selection of students should be profoundly influenced by their intellectual backgrounds or the diversity of students' learning abilities. This essay will discuss both views of the problem.
It is undeniable that the more resemble learning abilities vary between students, the easier teachers choose the most suitable curriculum for them. To illustrate, in a class, there are people who are excelled at academic subjects such as: Math, Physics, etc; however, other students find physical education much more bearable. Therefore, it is difficult for teacher to assess and select the precise lectures of a number of fields, which can result in the deterioration of teaching quality. Moreover, there will be several students who study worse in a particular subject than others. Teachers, as a result, may sometimes pause the lecture merely to explain for the students who do not understand. This action will happen for a long time which interprets other students studying process.
On the other hand, divergent backgrounds of learning capacity can benefit students. Specifically, it helps students realize that no one is perfect. For example, numerous students who have excellent academic results find others inferior compared to them. They, therefore, become arrogant and consider themselves the best. However, if they are put in a sport competition with students who are a specialist in this field, students with good academic attainment may lose and start to develop their insecurities. For the reason, a class with various studying performance will help students find the balance in their viewpoints and learn how to sympathize with others' mistakes.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is beneficial for students to study in an environment that diversify the learning abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44755244755 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88530824483 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3914333572 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284901695882 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923743415053 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532873777294 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176768819952 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473249337058 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.