Some people think that schools should teach/enroll students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities/skills studying together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions are divided as to whether or not a school should group their students by academic abilities. Whilst there are those who maintain that mixed-level classes are better, I believe that it is less effective than streamed classes.
There are numerous reasons why people might argue that a class should have students with different strengths, one of which is motivation. In a non-tracked class, when students see their friends study hard, they may be inspired to study harder. Because of the fear of falling behind, it is a huge motivation for them to study to catch up with each other. This would therefore increase educational effectiveness and test higher scores. Another justification is that high achievers can help each other study many subjects. For example, students who are good at Math can teach other students and can be helped in their weakness.
Notwithstanding some critics’ objection, I support the view that students should be grouped according to their abilities. First and foremost, students can study at their pace without having to wait or rush. When studying at their level, students do not have to study to catch up with their classmates, they also do not have to wait for teachers to teach the low-attaining pupils, which is saving a wealth of lecture time. It should also be noted that teachers are easier to prepare lessons and teach. Because teachers know their students' level, it is much easier to choose pedagogical methods to teach. Streamed classes mean that teachers do not need to give extra guidance for the underperforming pupils, which would in turn get the most out of time in the classroom.
In sum, while there are sensible reasons to believe that mixed-ability model have its own benefits, my own view is that a class with students who have similar abilities is more effective in students' learning progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey which asked people what they thought the main causes of crime were 70
- The graph below shows expenditure share for selected components in three countries in 2014 73
- development in technology has brought various environmental problems some people believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems other however believe technology is the way to solve these problems discuss both views and give 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the kiwi
- The table below shows the number of female prisoners by race and age in 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
Opinions are divided as to whether or not a school should group their students by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
... is more effective in students learning progress.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71479831113 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1326635703 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39057458903 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124874187009 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825046400172 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235296314656 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430589514698 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.