Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the impact of social media has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that social networking services exert a detrimental influence on users as well as society, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from making use of social media. Perhaps the principal benefit is that the advancement of social networking services has revolutionised the way people communicate with each other considering that users are able to send messages to their family members or friends regardless of time and place. Furthermore, on social networking sites, people can share their interests with acquaintances, which makes it possible for them not only to build a strong relationship but also to strengthen their bonds.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the use of social networking sites merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that children vulnerable to distinguishing right from wrong are more likely to being exposed to crimes because offenders can contact youngsters by creating fake profiles with greater ease, which even leads to an increase in abduction. In addition, those who have difficulty controlling themselves become easily addicted to social networking sites. This means that excessive use of social media prevents pupils and working adults from concentrating on their work or studies, affecting their work or academic performance in a negative way. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2023-06-28 | Baobestfriend | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | truong3011 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | truong3011 | 56 | view |
- Q20 The family has a great influence on children s development but the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part in children s life Do you agree or disagree 84
- Q Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends Why does this happen What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole C E 84
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 47
- Q In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss bo 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ecently
ecently, the impact of social media has become ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ting their work or academic performance in a negative way. In light of the above, I also find the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.325 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8861468691 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9908613932 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147506066867 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049405892554 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449489504428 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812718732415 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492172790584 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.