Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
It is believed by few that imposing penalties and fines for not following the traffic rules, is the most suitable way for reducing the number of traffic accidents. On the other hand,this opinion is denied by some people. According to them, some other solutions would be more efficient than punishments, such as proper city planning and spreading awareness.
In the recent years, the number of traffic accidents occurring each year has dramatically increased.This is not limited to one country, but the growth can be seen worldwide. According to some individuals, the prime cause of traffic accidents is ignorance of traffic rules. Many people break traffic laws by driving in the wrong direction, even in the areas, where wrong side driving is strictly prohibited. This leads to increase in chances of getting hit by the vehicles coming from other directions. Traffic signals are also not being followed in some areas. People don't stop even after seeing red signals. This situation culminates into accidents. Implementing stringent laws and punishments would induce fear in the public. If heavy fine is imposed upon the civilians for breaching the laws, then incidents of driving offenses will decrease. This will, ultimately, reduce accidents.
On the other hand, implementing laws is not sufficient. Some unscrupulous people will still breach the law and bribe some venal traffic officers. According to me, the primary reason in climbing number of accidents is growing use of vehicles. Due to industrialization and globalization, two-wheeler and four-wheeler have become cheaper than before. At the same time, public transport and road facilities are not sufficient for growing population. So more and more people buy private vehicles. Moreover, the roads are not wide enough to accommodate these much vehicles, which is the main reason for traffic accidents. Laws won't be helpful to solve the situation. The condition can only be ameliorated by widening the roads and making public transport effective. One other reason for accidents is lack of awareness among people regarding driving safety. The citizens don't know the actual reason behind the traffic rules. People in some rural areas are not even aware about these rules and the consequences of not following the rules. So training people for road safety will also help in reducing the traffic accidents.
In conclusion, while it is true that strict punishment is plays an important role in reducing number of accidents, but development of roads and spreading awareness are more effective solutions than punishments. So more budget should be allocated for construction of new roads and road safety training.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- Claim:In order to help small business thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 70
- The chart illustrates the number of hours spent each week by teenagers in Chester on seven different activities from 2002 to 2007. 67
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 58
- The chart illustrates the percentage of people( men, women, and children) who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- The chart illustrates the percentage of people men women and children who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
... of traffic accidents. On the other hand,this opinion is denied by some people. Accor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ng each year has dramatically increased.This is not limited to one country, but the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ot being followed in some areas. People dont stop even after seeing red signals. Thi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... and bribe some venal traffic officers. According to me, the primary reason in climbing number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 554, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...re not wide enough to accommodate these much vehicles, which is the main reason for ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 865, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... regarding driving safety. The citizens dont know the actual reason behind the traff...
^^^^
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of new roads and road safety training.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35154394299 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86267922125 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532066508314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3512208936 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4642857143 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0357142857 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03571428571 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33295133003 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836160431562 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495407749931 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214330519475 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019652691409 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.