Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Given how often chaotic and disastrous road accidents occur nowadays, some people believe that severe penalties for traffic violations can be the ultimate solution to this issue. In stark contrast, others beg to differ as they think different methods would be more efficient in dealing with such problems. Because of the following rationale, I strongly support the latter group’s idea.
On the one hand, harsh punishments are extremely effective short-term solutions to minimize traffic calamities. The government oughts to employ penalties and fines for these incidents, no matter how significant or petty they might be, as it would be a constant reminder that could cost time and money to the convicts of their mistakes and foolishness on the road, preventing them from ever committing such horrible blunders. In addition, when strict regulations are imposed, drivers will be much more careful with their attentiveness and control over their vehicles so as not to pay for their carelessness. Furthermore, the money gained from traffic offenders can be of great aid for the national budget, helping the government invest in building facilities. Hence, the effectiveness of punishments for driving carelessly can not be overlooked.
On the other hand, it is wiser to consider other solutions to improve road safety. This is by far the better choice because in many cases, accidents happen because of subjective or situational factors such as weather conditions, road potholes, or the unsafe state of guard rails. Not everybody is inclined to be ruled under an iron fist and fear for their financial circumstances even when they are not to blame. Rather, citizen-friendly approaches to resolve the matter should be implemented, such as investing in renovating and improving road safety. Furthermore, basic driving lessons and skills should be taught without costing a fortune to be available to every driver regardless of their background. Another point worth noting is that smart cars nowadays are also a wonderful substitute for traditional means of transport as they can detect and avoid incoming dangers. Some alternative methods should be employed to simultaneously reduce accidents and be in favor of citizens.
All in all, while there exist many opposing standpoints to this arguments, thank to the aforementioned rationale, from my point of view, different strategies should be implemented to decrease traffic offenses instead of severe punishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 67
- 51 What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The availability of unhealthy food such as fast food and junk food has become more widespread in recent years What are some of the problems associated with this development and what action can be taken to solve them 84
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...here exist many opposing standpoints to this arguments, thank to the aforementioned ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, while, in addition, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46596858639 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00679493267 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2958683215 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272275337838 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879220154612 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560274214727 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15230947935 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598475404908 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.