Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to
reducing traffic accidents. Others, however,believe that other measures would be
more effective in improving road safety.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While a majority of people suppose that relentless penalties for the careless driver are good ways to decrease road accidents, others think that some different solutions could implement to support traffic safety. In my viewpoint, I agree with the second statement.
On the one hand, we can not refuse the benefits of strict fines for driving habits. Without these laws, a number of careless drivers will disregard human life and the consequences tend to be more serious. For example, in 2005, because of government did not enact the hard punishments for these drivers, more than 4000 cases of car accidents happened in just the first 5 months. Besides, if offensive drivers do not go to jail because of their careless that lead to death for others, more and more innocent people would be suffered by them.
On the other hand, several measures can be implemented to improve road safety. Firstly, if authorities can construct more pavement for pedestrians, they tend to walk on their ways instead of the roads for cars. For instance, in Hanoi, road accidents reduced dramatically because of the building of the priority pavements. Secondly, police officers should increase their appearance at the intersection of the streets to balance the traffic flows. Because people usually do not know how to escape when traffic congestion happens in the rush hours, and the officers, therefore, will guide and instruct them to deal with these difficult situations.
In conclusion, although hard punishments can improve road safety, in my opinion, I totally agree that several other ways also will decrease traffic accidents.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 56
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999and 2008. 56
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o deal with these difficult situations. In conclusion, although hard punishments...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21072796935 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69092109799 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9458168767 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251609907882 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880243740476 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638373583448 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161230817065 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265482354963 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.