Some people think studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give our own opinion.
Nowadays, arguments about whether people in modern life should learn and understand national and international history are becoming a topic of public interest. There is a school of thought holds that understanding the past provides a variety of precious details, whilst others insist on the uselessness of something belonging to the past. Both views are discussed in this essay before I demonstrate some personal perspectives.
There are many compelling reasons why many people suppose that it is not necessary to learn old stories. At present, humans contend that science and technology take the main accountabilities to improve living standards as well as human awareness. Moreover, the development of the internet brings them huge information in every aspect of their life. It acts as a precursor to reducing attention about their history, which is not interesting enough for them to read and explore.
Notwithstanding all the above-mentioned beliefs, there are a group of people of all ages still consider that history contains colossal valuable for the current situations. Many experiences of ancestors in previous generations are recorded to help people can choose more accurate decisions in daily life. Moreover, some old stories also include a dozen practical skills that can be applied to all emergency circumstances. Historical theories also is a major contributor to the current advanced devices and machines.
In conclusion, people never attain all the huge profits for the time being without experiencing all the difficulties in the past. People should discover the whole meaning of history not only to enhance the advantages and maintain the culture nourishing the society but also to avoid some mistakes of ancestors to make some wise choices for the next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...he above-mentioned beliefs, there are a group of people of all ages still consider th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43525179856 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04821468289 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8507994176 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.230769231 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192799247786 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589892759161 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405811977773 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109021366201 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421751644548 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.