Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is sometimes argued whether residents are free to make noise as much as they want or have to comply with the restriction policies. This essay attempts to shed light on both perspectives before concluding that I am in favor of the latter notion.
On the one hand, the option to generate noise freely to large extent without limit could be advantageous to a certain extent. The first reason for this is producing cacophony is a mandatory activity for urban citizens. This could be perfectly explained by the fact that people tend to find an effective way such as karaoke to relieve considerable stress at work or school that they suffered from, which gently becomes one of their foundational demands. The second reason is the invention of soundproofing materials allows numerous residential facilities and public edifices as apartment buildings to be constructed. Consequently, regulations for making clamor could be no longer imposed since people have private spaces to generate noise freely.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convinced that it is undeniable that putting noise-making under control is imperative. Firstly, listening to high pitch din could lead to a deterioration in the individual’s health in the long term. For example, after lengthy exposure to loud sounds in the workplace, people tend to become temporarily deaf or permanently endure auditory impairments. Secondly, inhabitants are interrupted by excessive uproar from working or studying. This is because concentration cannot be facilitated without appropriate control over making noise, leading to the hazard of developmental delay and retardation possibility.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that there are scores of reasons for making blare freely as its convenience of entertainment, I would contend that solutions should be expedited to deaden noise pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | harry@uppal | 84 | view |
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree and disagree about this option 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...eely. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convince...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42711864407 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13400051167 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6656173438 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228814629521 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703253562042 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058082709733 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131373637311 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210341762031 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.