Some people think typical teaching of a teacher and students will not exist by the year 2050. Do you agree or disagree?
In this cutting-edge era, a vast majority of people are considering about ordinary style of teaching and educators. They tend to believe that traditional method of teaching and students will no more in the upcoming years. I agree with this notion for raft of reasons, elaborated in the impending passages.
The first and foremost reason for champion the given statement is, owing to the advancement in technology, an inordinate number of pupils prefer to study via smartphones. This technology allure them the most rather than studying at school. Moreover, educators take keen interest in Online Studies, as they it more convenient for them. Another tangible reason is, in most of the schools, it is witnessed that, the curricula by which educators obtain knowledge was obsolete. Therefore, scholars forcibly had to learn revised syllabus.
Another convincing reason to fortify this notion is, each child will have his or her own portable laptop in future and notebooks will not consider by them anymore. This fact is also undeniable that, education system is ameliorating digitally nowadays across the globe. Parents will not shell out much of their money for school fees since they would believe that e-learning will much cost effective. Last but not least, all the textbooks and notebooks will be extinct in the years to come.
To conclude, it can be reiterated that, traditional method of teaching will definitely disappear in the upcoming years due to the advancements in technologies. Pupils will more fascinate by latest technologies for pursue their further studies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | Sahil_bains7 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Sahil_bains7 | 61 | view |
| 2021-03-09 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | quocthinh95 | 82 | view |
- Some people think typical teaching of a teacher and students will not exist by the year 2050 Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think typical teaching of a teacher and students will not exist by the year 2050 Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while other think that TV is better for this purpose Discuss both views give your opinion and relevant examples 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore fascinate by latest technologies for pursue their further studies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31075697211 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79772632382 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641434262948 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2545245038 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128031501511 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430455496993 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433825269174 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864613490917 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533809945483 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.