Some people think that typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. Do you agree or disagree?
Have you ever wondered how the teaching method will be changed in the next 50 years? Up till now, education has attracted many considerable interested in the general public. To raise up an educational quality, authorities have looked for the new techniques to alternate outdated ways. To the best of my knowledge, the traditional teaching methods consist of teacher and children in the class will be continued, although the benefits of a new teaching method are incontrovertible.
The first reason is that the teachers play a role not only impart knowledge but also educate morality for students. While the parents who have a lot of time to communicate with their children at home, the teachers will interact with children in the rest of the time at school. Therefore, teachers play an important role to design and nurture behavior and righteousness of students especially young children. As an old saying: "a talented man without virtue is useless" indicated people should be learned both of them to become a complete person. To short, people have to keep the teachers in class to balance between knowledge and moral.
Another reason to keep the teacher and students in class is that the teachers who conduct and accommodate the knowledge for students. Indeed, in modern life, people are framed by the amount of information involve bad and cheap knowledge. Because of this, students need to have a guide to instruct the appropriate ways to approach education. It cannot envision when students study incorrect chemical theory, for example, the safe ways to use acid in experiments. Not only does it injure students physically but also it expires students' consciousness. Thus, teachers are so-called guides need to exist in the future class.
In conclusion, the traditional class including teacher and students should be kept by the year 2050 and after. These will support for education for both of sides: morality education and knowledge instruction. In my personal view, there are combine between traditional and new methods in teaching to improve the education environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-09 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | quocthinh95 | 82 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think that typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 Do you agree or disagree 82
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give our opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ted many considerable interested in the general public. To raise up an educational quality, au...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'combines'?
Suggestion: combines
...ruction. In my personal view, there are combine between traditional and new methods in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...traditional and new methods in teaching to improve the education environment.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24107142857 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89685784256 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5386856616 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251913889096 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793791813443 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638070724405 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150595804774 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212715272199 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.