Some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel but other people think that it is necessary for the development of science Discuss both views and give your opinion
Whether deploying animals for experimenting new medical applications or not is of broad interest to the general public. In my opinion, even though the method seems unacceptable at first, its impacts on the medical sector and the public health are unarguable.
It is understandable why many object to the deployment of animals for testing purpose. The first rationale in support of this view is that as other living organism, the tamed creatures deserved the right to live and thrive in their own habitat. Thus, humankind, as an integral part of nature is not allowed for violating of the natural order. An additional point is that these animals are likely to possess a sense of emotion which include fear, love and they even can feel pain thereby conducting operation or feeding them untested medicines would subsequently result in traumatized experiences for them. Given our humanity values humans have spent centuries to establish, trial on animals is largely contradict with our acclamation.
On the other hand, replacement of animals in experiments bring tremendous benefits to the civilization. With animals exchanging for humans in certain tests or studies, the risk of humans’ exposure to hazardous substances or side-effects on one’s body would be minimized. Furthermore, the use of animals would reduce the cost of conducting studies or researches in the healthcare industry. The expenditure normally takes up a huge proportion of tax funding which could be allocated to other priorities. Finally, only few animals is compatible for the use of experimentation. One price example is that mice are widely used in lab thanks to their genetic similarities to human and these animals abounds on our planet.
In these light of these facts, i am of the latter idea that certain animals should be harnessed as subjects in medical trials to guarantee for humans’ well-being and the flourishment of our society.
In sum, use of living animals in testing new medical techniques sometimes violates our honorable values. However, this movement bring massive merits to the public which definitely outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | lananhle301 | 78 | view |
| 2014-12-15 | Darby | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems To some extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it is necessary but others hold that it is unfair Discuss both views and give your own opinions 84
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ions or not is of broad interest to the general public. In my opinion, even though the method ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun object seems to be countable; consider using: 'many objects'.
Suggestion: many objects
... unarguable. It is understandable why many object to the deployment of animals for testin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
... establish, trial on animals is largely contradict with our acclamation. On the other ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...planet. In these light of these facts, i am of the latter idea that certain anim...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, so, thus, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30860534125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9809746972 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59940652819 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3274689034 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163804111819 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588757085512 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035995688883 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855429605347 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373917585239 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.