Some people think that we should invent a new language for
international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems?
Granted, some people would argue that due to the tendency of the world to move towards the globalization era, it is necessary for humankind to create a joint language catering to international communication. This idea, according to this theory, is supposed to produce various beneficial results. Take, for example, internationally accepted certificates such as the IELTS or TOEIC certificates are often required by universities in the west for students from non-native English-speaking countries. However, these students would stand a higher chance of gaining scholarships and studying abroad if there was a language for international communication. Another benefit of this is also seen in the fact that businesses and brands are able to collaborate with those in other nations as they no longer have translators represent their plans or strategies, enhancing the accuracy of commercial contracts.
Despite some positives mentioned above, the invention of a new linguistic system may encounter difficulties halfway through since it takes ages and a great effort to do so. Such production may entail a number of competent scientists from different countries to work out a new language system that can be widely applied irrespective of culture and accent diversity. Moreover, it would take a long time before this language is completely reached and used by each citizen. Additionally, some languages such as English or Arabic have been commonly agreed as international languages given that millions of people speak them around the world. This very fact has rendered such inventions unnecessary, nay nigh on impossible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53225806452 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23534878951 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673387096774 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.387403066 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284985110495 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981173024553 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037072555772 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211314656112 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00665887496721 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.