Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A significantly large number of people are of the opinion that employees should hire ingenious workers with an ability to work independently, while other speculators believe that businesses should aim to take people who are able to collaborate with their co-workers and follow their directions. This essay will discuss both views in detail.
On the one hand, staff members who are able to work alone have a sense of ownership. In other words, laborers who are capable of performing individually have a feeling of ownership and full control of their actions. Some may find it beneficial, since work is done expeditiously and operatives execute assigned tasks effectively. However, in some cases individual work is due to the shortage of staff members and many workplaces seem to overload their employees with an excessive number of tasks. For example, nowadays, there is only one labourer operating in workplaces such as fast food establishment's drive-thru. This is a drawback for many people.
On the other hand, teamwork can be extremely beneficial if team members are on an even working field. When each and every one of group members are equally competent, work can be done efficiently without any struggle. Some may view working in a team advantageous, since it offers workers a potential ability to do more than one person could handle by delegating duties. Moreover, work can be done effectively and efficiently if staff are uniformly proficient and skilled, otherwise, exertion may be slowed down because of some staff member's lack of certain abilities. Furthermore, the cons of this approach includes possible dispute that may arise between employees due to several factors, such as misunderstanding of an assigned work and unwillingness of some workers to perform the job.
In conclusion, working individually and in a team environment both have a set of advantages and drawbacks that may be suitable for different people. In my opinion, I find team working more comfortable, as I sometimes need guidance from my peers and co-workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | jany01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | gwyneth+12 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | stsoutsold | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | moctutuyen | 84 | view |
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the cause of this Can you suggest some possible solution 67
- Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum How far do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both views an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...bers are on an even working field. When each and every one of group members are equally competent,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24012158055 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05240730306 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0067357567 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280005757248 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849610454741 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744232722105 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17542915335 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103679288198 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.