Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals?
Recently, there have been a great deal of controversy about children doing volunteer work. Some hold the view that it is advantageous for the youth to partake in unpaid jobs to help the public; whereas, others opine this is more counterproductive. This essay would discuss both of these views and explain my personal opinion.
On the negative side, volunteering can result in some adverse consequences, one of which is child abuse. Although juveniles’ involvement in social service comes from positive purposes, some disguised charities may take advantage of adolescents’ naivety to entice and exploit their labor. Since the young are lack of experience, they will be more likely to suffer from overwork or money scam. Besides, poor academic performance of youngsters sometimes stems from volunteering activities. For example, some teenagers’ excessive spending of time for volunteering might deprive themselves of time for study, which leads to their low score in tests.
Notwithstanding the downsides of the young taking part in non-profit jobs, I reckon that the merits of unpaid jobs for children cannot be outweighed by the aforementioned drawbacks. It is obvious that almost every volunteering activity requires deep devotion, and active cooperation of teenagers. Additionally, joing in charity means that adolescents would have to face different kinds of situations. Thus, they will be able to embrace a vast array of soft skills such as communication or time-management skills. Besides, voluntary work presents golden opportunities for the young generation to gain insight into the real society and the misery burdening on the needy. They might be aware of how lucky they are, therefore being motivated to lead a responsible life and contribute more to the benefits the society.
In conclusion, although numerous arguments over juveniles joining voluntary work have been provoked , I hold a firm belief that the plus points of this requirement can outweigh the minus ones. (309 words)
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deal of controversy about children doing volunteer work. Some hold the view that ...
^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...cuss both of these views and explain my personal opinion. On the negative side, volunteering c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oining voluntary work have been provoked , I hold a firm belief that the plus poin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45806451613 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11273616879 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3002682903 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172335812268 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046522066215 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338310892177 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984679718784 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237139599576 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.