Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
There are different perspectives on the morality of keeping animals in zoos. While many individuals believe that zoos play an essential role in conserving endangered animals, others regard such captivity as inhumane due to the limits it places on animals’ natural behaviors.
On the one hand, proponents contend that zoos are of paramount importance in safeguarding endangered species that are on the brink of extinction. For centuries, animals have been illegally hunted for their horns, fur, and teeth, which have immense value for traditional medical treatments and decorative purposes. Living in zoos, animals are protected from poachers who might otherwise hunt them to extinction. For example, the black rhinoceros, which is one of the most scarce species, survives largely thanks to the operation of zoos and their conservation programs. In other words, zoos are necessary captivity that facilitates the preservation of animals and, therefore, curbs the threat of biodiversity loss.
On the other hand, there is an ethical issue related to the adverse effects of zoos on natural behaviors that justifies the prohibition of zoos. Firstly, as zoos are restricted enclosures and possess certain dissimilarities with the wilderness, many creatures may feel lethargic and struggle to adapt. A salient example can be observed in elephants, whose most instinctive desire is to migrate. Being prevented from performing this task due to the small-scale artificial habitat can potentially trigger aggressive reactions. Furthermore, although it is true that living and breeding in zoos effectively counters shrinking populations that illegal hunting causes, animals born in captivity will soon become dependent on humans and consequently struggle to reintegrate into the wild.
In conclusion, while the advantages of zoos in animal conservation are reasonable to some extent, I believe that zoos should be banned due to the potential detrimental impact on the nature of wild animals. I would suggest that governments take prompt measures to tackle poaching and the degradation of the ecosystem instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 766, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and consequently struggle to reintegrate into the wild. In conclusion, while the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62264150943 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04911472224 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.714121887 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230118589776 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729533332102 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578542636234 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141017922038 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404944944214 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.